For the majority of bleary-eyed travellers, airports are a
valued means of transit to that next business meeting or - for the
luckier ones - that first umbrella-garnished cocktail. Steeped in
functionality and structure, the airport's bustle is generally
forgotten the moment its visitors collect their last elusive
suitcase and make for the taxi rank.
But for the residents and businesses situated within a close
proximity to airports, the relationship with these lively hubs of
aerial activity is of necessity a far less fleeting and entirely
more complex, one. Indeed, such relationships cannot be placed in a
holding pattern when convenient: airports do not simply disappear
with the last 'fasten seatbelt' sign, and instead yield a permanent
influence on local infrastructure, business and housing.
Cognisant of the need to better regulate such interactions, the
Gillard government made consultation between airports and
sometimes-competing airport stakeholders a priority, establishing
independently-chaired Community Aviation Consultation Groups
(CACG's) in order to better foster productive discussion and
dialogue. Created on the back of the government's 2009 'Flight Path
to the Future' initiative, these bodies now ensure a formal
community voice at each of Australia's major airports, with all
federally-leased airports required to institute a CACG.
One significant development generated out of the establishment
of the Essendon CACG is the successful negotiation of the 'Fly
Neighbourly Agreement', a voluntary accord espousing
resident-conscious practices at Essendon Airport. Implemented
twelve months ago, the agreement itself sets out a list of key
principles to which its signatories pledge compliance, among them
reducing unnecessary engine revs, maintaining a height of above
1000 feet unless arriving or departing the airport, responding to
community inquiries about noise in a cooperative manner, and
ensuring that environmental awareness and noise issues are included
in pilot training. Air services operating out of Essendon are urged
to abide by the 'Fly Neighbourly Agreement's' inherently
conscientious philosophy, asserts Airport Operations Manager Graeme
Ware. "We encourage our operators to sign up to the 'Fly
Neighbourly Agreement' so that they might better consider the
community they are flying ver."
And with the issue of noise pollution accepted as a legitimate
concern, airport management are wholly committed to a conciliatory
approach, having recognised the importance of establishing
convivial, reciprocal relationships between the airport and the
community that envelops it. "Our business is continuing to grow,
and we have to manage that with community expectations. We may not
always share the same outlook, but as long as the various parties
treat each other with respect, solutions will inevitably reveal
themselves."
Like an air traffic controller brandishing his marshalling
wands, Ware is responsible for guiding all manner of complaints and
disputes, with a perusal of the CACG's minutes revealing a range of
disparate concerns voiced by residents and interest groups - from
helicopters operating out of curfew to unsound drainage of airport
stormwater. Ware - who once even went to the extraordinary lengths
of doing a 'graveyard shift' in a repeat complainant's house in
order to best appreciate a particularly sensitive noise issue -
remains committed to working with the community. "It is our
responsibility to treat residents with empathy and demonstrate a
willingness to work with all parties.
This is the reality of the daily management of modern airports."
A gradual increase in helicopter operations, for example, has
resulted in the airport instigating directions to helicopters to
fly over the less-populated open spaces to the north in order to
minimise those residents affected.
The voluntary nature of the 'Fly Neighbourly Agreement',
however, remains a point of contention. Though Sharp Airlines and
15 of the major operators are signed up at this point - including
the chief operators of jet aircraft and twin turbo prop aircraft
that provide regular commercial services to Victoria - significant
omissions remain. The failure of the Police Air Wing and Air
Ambulance Victoria to sign the agreement is one issue that has been
the subject of some CACG discussion. For Ware, the motivation for
spurning the agreement is, in this case, understandable. "Both
organisations perform a critical role for Victorians in terms of
life-saving processes, and are of the view that their pilots must
remain free to make the operational decisions that they need to
make. And though they are not signatories, they operate very much
in principle with the 'Fly Neighbourly Agreement'. They are mindful
of noise issues wherever possible, but don't want to be compromised
should a life-threatening situation emerge."
For Essendon CACG member and Moonee Valley City Councillor
Janette Chantry, the 'Fly Neighbourly Agreement' is perhaps best
summarised as a work in progress. Whilst firmly opposed to any
further expansion of activities at the airport, Chantry is quick to
acknowledge recent gains. "Since the introduction of the 'Fly
Neighbourly Agreement' there has been a marked improvement from the
various operators of planes in and out of Essendon Airport."
Further negotiation will be vital, however, in achieving a mutually
agreeable standard. "The committee and concerned residents believe
that more effort is required from the operators to ensure less
noise and pollution over the airport. The residents would like to
see more noise monitoring devices installed in Bowes Avenue Airport
West and in the Essendon area as well." Cutting back on more
superfluous jy flights- as opposed to the more essential emergency
air wing services and executive jet aircraft - also remains a key
concern for the community.
Like Ware, however, Councillor Chantry remains optimistic that
favourable outcomes can be realised. "The new management at
Essendon Airport has endeavoured to improve the relationship
between residents and operators and I commend them on their efforts
to date."